Screener
YJUN vs AFMC
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFMC costs 0.22% less per year.
- YJUN is classified as alternative, while AFMC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- YJUN covers global markets; AFMC covers north america.
- YJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YJUN | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $153M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.2% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.88% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -21.53% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YJUN and AFMC
Explore further