Screener
YJUN vs INTL
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.06% less per year.
- YJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; INTL uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, INTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YJUN | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $222M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.2% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.88% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -21.53% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YJUN and INTL
Explore further