Screener
YYY vs CGMU
Amplify CEF High Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 2.96% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than YYY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YYY is classified as equity, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, YYY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YYY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YYY | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 3.23% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $712M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 12.48% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.53% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -42.52% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YYY and CGMU
Explore further