Screener
YYY vs MUSI
Amplify CEF High Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 2.85% less per year.
- YYY is significantly larger than MUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YYY is classified as equity, while MUSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- YYY follows a index tracking strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, YYY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YYY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YYY | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 3.23% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $712M | $214M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 12.48% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.53% | 3.35% |
| Max drawdown | -42.52% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YYY and MUSI
Explore further