Screener
YYYM vs DIVO
Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF vs Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIVO costs 2.22% less per year.
- DIVO is significantly larger than YYYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YYYM is classified as fixed income, while DIVO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- YYYM follows a index tracking strategy; DIVO uses option income.
- DIVO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YYYM | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.78% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.8M | $7.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.07% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.10% |
| Max drawdown | -5.25% | -30.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YYYM and DIVO
Explore further