Screener
ZAP vs AIQ
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.18% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | AIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $8.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +56.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 22.54% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -44.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and AIQ
Explore further