Screener
ZAP vs IDU
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs iShares U.S. Utilities ETF
Key differences
- IDU costs 0.12% less per year.
- IDU is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | IDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 13.61% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -36.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and IDU
Explore further