Skip to content
Screener

ZHOG vs ACIO

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF vs Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF

ZHOG

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF

Annual cost

0.43%

Fund size

$46M

ACIO

Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2.4B

Key differences

ZHOG is a fixed income ETF, while ACIO is an alternative ETF. ZHOG charges 0.43% a year and ACIO 0.79%.

  • ZHOG is a fixed income fund, while ACIO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ZHOG follows a active selection strategy; ACIO uses option income.
  • ZHOG costs 0.36% less per year.
  • ACIO is much larger than ZHOG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

ZHOGACIO
Annual cost (TER)0.43%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$46M$2.4B
Since20232019
Dividend yield5.61%0.38%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+5.3%+13.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+15.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.0%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.13
Volatility 1Y1.58%8.63%
Max drawdown-3.66%-14.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to ZHOG and ACIO