Screener
ZINC vs AMAX
Zacks Income ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- ZINC follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZINC | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $64M |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 10.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | — | -16.25% |
Similar to ZINC and AMAX
Explore further