Screener
ZOCT vs IIGD
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October vs Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.66% less per year.
- ZOCT is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZOCT is classified as alternative, while IIGD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ZOCT follows a structured outcome strategy; IIGD uses index tracking.
- IIGD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZOCT | IIGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 2.33% |
| Max drawdown | -3.18% | -11.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZOCT and IIGD
Explore further