Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ZSB vs CTA

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

ZSB

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$2M

CTA

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$1.6B

Key differences

Both ZSB and CTA are alternative ETFs. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and CTA 0.75%. The main difference: ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.

  • ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
  • ZSB costs 0.16% less per year.
  • CTA is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, CTA has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ZSBCTA
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$1.6B
Since20232022
Dividend yield0.81%5.05%
Asset classalternativealternative
Region
Strategymulti strategysystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+69.0%+12.2%
CAGR 3Y+4.9%+10.9%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.160.51
Volatility 1Y26.52%20.23%
Max drawdown-49.26%-18.07%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ZSB and CTA