Screener
ZSB vs GGM
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
ZSB is an alternative ETF, while GGM is an equity ETF. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and GGM 0.94%.
- ZSB is an alternative fund, while GGM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; GGM uses active selection.
- ZSB costs 0.35% less per year.
- GGM is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZSB | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $18M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +69.0% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.52% | 11.54% |
| Max drawdown | -49.26% | -19.68% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.