Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ZSB vs MSMR

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund vs McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF

ZSB

USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$2M

MSMR

McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF

Annual cost

1.06%

Fund size

$180M

Key differences

ZSB is an alternative ETF, while MSMR is an equity ETF. ZSB charges 0.59% a year and MSMR 1.06%.

  • ZSB is an alternative fund, while MSMR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ZSB follows a multi strategy strategy; MSMR uses active selection.
  • ZSB costs 0.47% less per year.
  • MSMR is much larger than ZSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MSMR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ZSBMSMR
Annual cost (TER)0.59%1.06%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$180M
Since20232021
Dividend yield0.81%1.82%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth america
Strategymulti strategyactive selection
CAGR 1Y+69.0%+21.3%
CAGR 3Y+4.9%+18.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.161.22
Volatility 1Y26.52%12.34%
Max drawdown-49.26%-14.86%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ZSB and MSMR