Screener
ZTEN vs SLQD
F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.09% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than ZTEN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZTEN covers global markets; SLQD covers north america.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZTEN | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.56% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.06% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -5.36% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZTEN and SLQD
Explore further