EOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
Seeks to provide investors with returns that match the return of the Underlying ETF, up to the upside cap of 15.20% while providing a buffer against the first 15% of Underlying ETF losses.
By Innovator ETFs · Launched 2021
0.89%
#4,486 of 5,562 · expensive
$110M
#2,840 of 5,562 · mid-size
+24.1%
4 years
#2,501 of 5,562 · seasoned
Performance
Total-return NAV · USDTotal-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.
Classification
How Beacon categorizes this fundAsset class
AlternativeRegion
Emerging marketsStrategy
Structured outcome
Index tracked
MSCI Emerging Markets Index
What it actually holds
By weightConcentration
Top 5 holdings = 100.1% of fundconcentrated
Asset allocation
Risk profile
Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ yearsYear-on-year price swings
Worst peak-to-trough loss
Where to buy
Listing
- Exchange
- NYSE Arca
Full fund details
- Objective
- Seeks to provide investors with returns that match the return of the Underlying ETF, up to the upside cap of 15.20% while providing a buffer against the first 15% of Underlying ETF losses.
- Strategy
- Invests primarily in FLEX Options referencing the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and may also invest directly in the Underlying ETF. The Fund aims to replicate the performance of the Underlying ETF while providing a buffer against the first 15% of losses during the Outcome Period. The strategy is designed to produce returns capped at 15.20% before fees, with a net buffer of 14.11% after management fees. The Underlying ETF seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, representing mid- and large-cap securities in emerging markets.
- Inception date
- September 30, 2021
- Fund family
- Innovator ETFs
Similar ETFs
Closest matches by profileOur take
Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.
Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost
Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.
Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)
Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy
Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More
What's next?
You've reviewed EOCT. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.
Data updated on 2026-06-19