Skip to content

GSPYGotham Enhanced 500 ETF

Grow my money5y track recordRanked #1,331 of 2,960 in this goal

Seeks long-term capital appreciation.

By Gotham · Launched 2020

Annual Cost

0.50%

#2,576 of 5,562 · average

Fund Size

$726M

#1,300 of 5,562 · large

Return (1Y)Goal

+27.7%

Track Record

5 years

#2,268 of 5,562 · seasoned

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$12,774+27.7%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

Classification

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Equity

Cap

Large

Strategy

Active selection

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 41.4% of fundmoderately concentrated

Microsoft Corp
6.9%
NVIDIA Corp
6.9%
Apple Inc
6.5%
Alphabet Inc
4.7%
Amazon.com Inc
4.7%
Meta Platforms Inc
3.2%
Mount Vernon Liquid Assets Portfolio, LLC
2.9%
Broadcom Inc
2.4%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
1.7%
Tesla Inc
1.5%

Asset allocation

Stocks
99.8%
Cash
0.1%
Other
0.1%

By sector

Technology
38.5%
Financial Services
11.4%
Consumer Cyclical
11.0%
Communication
10.1%
Healthcare
8.8%
Industrials
8.0%
Consumer Defensive
5.6%
Energy
2.7%
Other
4.0%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
12.8%Moderate

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-23.3%Moderate

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
1.13Strong risk-adjusted returns
Sortino (3Y)
1.64Good downside protection

Where to buy

Listing

Exchange
NYSE Arca

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Strategy
Actively managed fund investing in S&P 500 securities, using an enhanced strategy to assess value and weight holdings. Employs a systematic, bottom-up valuation approach to identify undervalued or overvalued companies.
Inception date
December 28, 2020
Fund family
Gotham

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Closet indexing
Warning

Closet indexer — active fees, passive behavior

This fund charges active-management fees but closely tracks its benchmark index. You may be paying a premium for active management that does not meaningfully exist — a combination of high R² versus the benchmark, low tracking error, and a TER sitting well above the passive peer-group median.

97.0%
TE
2.6%
Beta
0.96
Fee
4× 0.11%

Source: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)

Why we flagged this: strategy=active_selection + high_r_squared+low_tracking_error+near_market_beta+fee_premium

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've reviewed GSPY. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.

Data updated on 2026-06-19