Skip to content

INVGGMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF

Get income1y track recordRanked #1,049 of 1,622 in this goal

Seeks total return in excess of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Index.

By GMO · Launched 2025

Annual Cost

0.25%

#1,230 of 5,562 · low cost

Fund Size

$28M

#4,121 of 5,562 · small

Dividend YieldGoal

Track Record

1 year

#4,426 of 5,562 · young

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$10,561+5.6%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

Classification

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Fixed income

Strategy

Active selection

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 10.2% of fundwell diversified

EBAY INC
1.1%
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY
1.0%
VMWARE LLC
1.0%
BROOKFIELD FINANCE INC
1.0%
IQVIA INC
1.0%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
1.0%
VALERO ENERGY CORP
1.0%
SMITH & NEPHEW PLC
1.0%
POLARIS INC
1.0%
AEP TEXAS INC
1.0%

Asset allocation

Bonds
99.5%
Cash
0.5%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
4.4%Low

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-3.2%Mild

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
Unavailable

Needs 3+ years of history

Sortino (3Y)
Not yet

Needs 3+ years of history

Bond profile

Duration

5.2 years

Avg maturity

9.9 years

Where to buy

Listing

Exchange
NYSE Arca

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks total return in excess of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Index.
Strategy
Actively managed ETF investing primarily in U.S. investment grade debt securities. Utilizes a systematic approach analyzing bonds based on value, quality, momentum, and fundamentals, while managing exposure to risks like liquidity and credit spreads.
Inception date
June 3, 2025
Fund family
GMO

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Closet indexing
Warning

Closet indexer — active fees, passive behavior

This fund charges active-management fees but closely tracks its benchmark index. You may be paying a premium for active management that does not meaningfully exist — a combination of high R² versus the benchmark, low tracking error, and a TER sitting well above the passive peer-group median.

96.5%
TE
1.3%
Beta
0.82
Fee
4× 0.07%

Source: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)

Why we flagged this: strategy=active_selection + high_r_squared+low_tracking_error+fee_premium

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've reviewed INVG. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.

Data updated on 2026-06-19