Skip to content

MSLCMorgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Equity ETF

Grow my money34y track recordRanked #382 of 2,992 in this goal

Seeks capital appreciation.

By Morgan Stanley · Launched 1991

Annual Cost

0.39%

#1,911 of 5,854 · low cost

Fund Size

$4.0B

#503 of 5,854 · large

Return (1Y)Goal

+15.5%

Track Record

34 years

#5 of 5,854 · established

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$11,575+15.7%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

What's inside

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Equity

Cap

Large

Strategy

Active selection

Index tracked

Russell 1000 Index

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 32.0% of fundwell diversified

NVIDIA CORP
6.0%
MICROSOFT CORP
4.9%
APPLE INC
4.4%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.0%
ALPHABET INC-CL A
3.0%
META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A
2.6%
BROADCOM INC
2.3%
ALPHABET INC-CL C
1.9%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO
1.5%
TESLA INC
1.3%

Asset allocation

Stocks
98.6%
Cash
1.4%

By sector

Technology
33.8%
Financial Services
13.8%
Industrials
10.3%
Consumer Cyclical
10.1%
Communication
10.0%
Healthcare
9.0%
Consumer Defensive
3.7%
Energy
3.1%
Other
6.3%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
12.6%Moderate

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-17.9%Moderate

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
Unavailable

Needs 3+ years of history

Sortino (3Y)
Not yet

Needs 3+ years of history

Listing

Exchange
NYSE Arca

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks capital appreciation.
Strategy
Invests primarily in equity securities of large capitalization companies, defined as those typically within the range of the Russell 1000 Index. Employs a multi-manager strategy, allocating portions to professional money managers and may invest up to 10% in foreign issuers not traded on U.S. exchanges.
Inception date
November 18, 1991
Fund family
Morgan Stanley

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Closet indexing
Warning

You're paying active fees for an index

This fund charges active-management prices while tracking its benchmark almost perfectly (a high R²). The metrics below show how little active management you're getting for that premium: low tracking error and a fee well above the passive peer median.

95.1%
TE
3.9%
Beta
0.93
Fee
4× 0.10%

Sources: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've looked at MSLC. Save it to your watchlist to weigh it against other funds, then turn your shortlist into a portfolio.

Data updated on 2026-08-03