NJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July
By Innovator ETFs · Launched 2020
0.79%
#4,047 of 5,562 · expensive
$214M
#2,265 of 5,562 · mid-size
0.00%
5 years
#2,149 of 5,562 · seasoned
Performance
Total-return NAV · USDTotal-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.
Classification
How Beacon categorizes this fundWhat it actually holds
By weightAsset allocation
Risk profile
Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ yearsYear-on-year price swings
Worst peak-to-trough loss
Where to buy
Listing
- Exchange
- Cboe BZX
Full fund details
- Strategy
- The Fund employs a defined outcome strategy, investing primarily in FLEX Options that reference the Underlying ETF, which tracks the S&P 500 Index. It aims to deliver predetermined investment outcomes, including positive returns during the Outcome Period, subject to an Upside Cap and a Buffer against losses, while also allowing for potential positive returns if the Underlying ETF experiences losses within specified limits.
- Inception date
- June 30, 2020
- Fund family
- Innovator ETFs
Similar ETFs
Closest matches by profileOur take
Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.
Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost
Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.
Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)
Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy
Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More
What's next?
You've reviewed NJUL. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.
Data updated on 2026-06-19