Skip to content

NJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - June

Grow my money2y track recordRanked #2,039 of 2,969 in this goal

Seeks to provide investors with returns that match the return of the Underlying ETF, up to the upside cap of 15.38% while providing a buffer against the first 15% of Underlying ETF losses.

By Innovator ETFs · Launched 2024

Annual Cost

0.79%

#4,056 of 5,573 · expensive

Fund Size

$54M

#3,505 of 5,573 · mid-size

Return (1Y)Goal

+13.4%

Track Record

2 years

#3,605 of 5,573 · seasoned

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$11,322+13.2%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

What's inside

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Alternative

Strategy

Structured outcome

Index tracked

Nasdaq-100 Index

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 5 holdings = 100.1% of fundconcentrated

N/A
107.5%
N/A
1.1%
US BANK MMDA - USBGFS 9
0.3%
N/A
-0.4%
N/A
-8.5%

Asset allocation

Stocks
80.8%
Cash
19.2%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
7.1%Low

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-12.6%Mild

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
Unavailable

Needs 3+ years of history

Sortino (3Y)
Not yet

Needs 3+ years of history

Listing

Exchange
Cboe BZX

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks to provide investors with returns that match the return of the Underlying ETF, up to the upside cap of 15.38% while providing a buffer against the first 15% of Underlying ETF losses.
Strategy
Invests primarily in the Invesco QQQ Trust to replicate the Underlying ETF's performance, providing a 15% buffer against losses during the Outcome Period from June 1, 2025 to May 31, 2026.
Inception date
May 31, 2024
Fund family
Innovator ETFs

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Buffer
Warning

Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost

Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.

Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)

Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've looked at NJUN. Save it to your watchlist to weigh it against other funds, then turn your shortlist into a portfolio.

Data updated on 2026-06-20