Skip to content

PSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

Grow my moneyDiversifier5y track recordRanked #53 of 240 in this goal

Seeks capital appreciation with downside protection.

By Pacer · Launched 2020

Annual Cost

0.66%

#3,374 of 5,562 · average

Fund Size

$580M

#1,452 of 5,562 · large

Return (1Y)Goal

+15.4%

Track Record

5 years

#2,270 of 5,562 · seasoned

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$11,547+15.5%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

Classification

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Alternative

Strategy

Structured outcome

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 94.1% of fundconcentrated

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate July E
14.9%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate April
14.1%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate Januar
13.2%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate Octobe
13.0%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative Ap
10.3%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative Oc
7.3%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative Ju
7.1%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative Ja
5.1%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex January ET
4.6%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex July ETF
4.4%

Asset allocation

Stocks
190.9%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
6.0%Low

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-10.8%Mild

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
1.05Strong risk-adjusted returns
Sortino (3Y)
1.52Good downside protection

Where to buy

Listing

Exchange
Cboe BZX

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks capital appreciation with downside protection.
Strategy
Actively managed fund investing primarily in other ETFs that focus on U.S. equity securities while limiting downside risk. Utilizes structured outcome strategies to buffer losses and cap gains.
Inception date
December 29, 2020
Fund family
Pacer

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Buffer
Warning

Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost

Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.

Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)

Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've reviewed PSFF. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.

Data updated on 2026-06-19