Skip to content

QBProShares Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF

Stay safeGrow my moneyNewRanked #300 of 340 in this goal

Seeks investment results that track the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer Index.

By ProShares · Launched 2025

Annual Cost

0.58%

#2,930 of 5,562 · average

Fund Size

$2M

#5,301 of 5,562 · small

Dividend YieldGoal

Track Record

12 months

#4,504 of 5,562 · young

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$11,774+17.7%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

Classification

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Alternative

Strategy

Structured outcome

Index tracked

Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer Index

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 62.5% of fundconcentrated

NVIDIA Corp.
9.1%
Apple, Inc.
8.8%
Microsoft Corp.
7.8%
Repurchase Agreement
7.5%
Broadcom, Inc.
6.7%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.3%
Repurchase Agreement
5.2%
Repurchase Agreement
4.5%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.9%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.7%

Asset allocation

Stocks
177.4%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
N/A
Max drawdown
-3.5%Mild

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
Unavailable

Needs 3+ years of history

Sortino (3Y)
Not yet

Needs 3+ years of history

Where to buy

Listing

Exchange
NASDAQ Global Select Market

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks investment results that track the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer Index.
Strategy
Invests primarily in financial instruments to track the Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer Index, which aims for upside participation in the Nasdaq-100 with downside mitigation. Utilizes a combination of long positions in the Nasdaq-100 Index and options to provide a daily buffer against losses.
Inception date
June 24, 2025
Fund family
ProShares

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Buffer
Warning

Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost

Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.

Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)

Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've reviewed QB. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.

Data updated on 2026-06-19