Skip to content

RSPGInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

Grow my money19y track recordRanked #526 of 2,992 in this goal

Tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index.

By Invesco · Launched 2006

Annual Cost

0.40%

#2,017 of 5,854 · average

Fund Size

$533M

#1,537 of 5,854 · large

Return (1Y)Goal

+42.6%

Track Record

19 years

#367 of 5,854 · established

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$15,162+51.6%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

What's inside

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Equity

Cap

Large

Strategy

Index enhanced

Sector

Energy

Index tracked

S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 48.6% of fundmoderately concentrated

APA Corp.
5.2%
Baker Hughes Co.
5.0%
SLB Ltd.
5.0%
Halliburton Co.
5.0%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.9%
Coterra Energy Inc.
4.8%
Devon Energy Corp.
4.8%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.6%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
4.6%
Valero Energy Corp.
4.6%

Asset allocation

Stocks
100.0%

By sector

Energy
100.0%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
22.1%High

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-73.2%Severe

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
0.59Decent risk-adjusted returns
Sortino (3Y)
0.79Moderate downside risk

Listing

Exchange
NYSE Arca

Full fund details

Objective
Tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index.
Strategy
Invests at least 90% of total assets in securities of the energy sector that comprise the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. The Fund employs a full replication methodology, investing in all index components, but may also use sampling methods as needed.
Inception date
November 1, 2006
Fund family
Invesco

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Closet indexing
Warning

You're paying active fees for an index

This fund charges active-management prices while tracking its benchmark almost perfectly (a high R²). The metrics below show how little active management you're getting for that premium: low tracking error and a fee well above the passive peer median.

95.6%
TE
4.9%
Beta
1.04
Fee
4× 0.10%

Sources: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've looked at RSPG. Save it to your watchlist to weigh it against other funds, then turn your shortlist into a portfolio.

Data updated on 2026-08-03