RSPGInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Seeks to track the investment results of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index.
By Invesco · Launched 2006
0.40%
#2,058 of 5,562 · average
$576M
#1,453 of 5,562 · large
+30.9%
19 years
#375 of 5,562 · established
Performance
Total-return NAV · USDTotal-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.
Classification
How Beacon categorizes this fundAsset class
EquityRegion
North americaCap
Large
Strategy
Index enhanced
Sector
EnergyIndex tracked
S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index
What it actually holds
By weightConcentration
Top 10 holdings = 48.1% of fundmoderately concentrated
Asset allocation
By sector
Risk profile
Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ yearsYear-on-year price swings
Worst peak-to-trough loss
Where to buy
Listing
- Exchange
- NYSE Arca
Full fund details
- Objective
- Seeks to track the investment results of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index.
- Strategy
- Invests at least 90% of total assets in securities of the Underlying Index, which includes energy sector companies from the S&P 500 Index. The Underlying Index is equal-weighted, assigning each component the same weight at quarterly rebalances. If fewer than 22 companies are eligible, it will include the largest energy companies from the S&P MidCap 400 Index to meet the minimum. The Fund may also invest in other ETFs focused on the energy sector.
- Inception date
- November 1, 2006
- Fund family
- Invesco
Similar ETFs
Closest matches by profileOur take
Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.
Closet indexer — active fees, passive behavior
This fund charges active-management fees but closely tracks its benchmark index. You may be paying a premium for active management that does not meaningfully exist — a combination of high R² versus the benchmark, low tracking error, and a TER sitting well above the passive peer-group median.
- R²
- 95.6%
- TE
- 4.9%
- Beta
- 1.05
- Fee
- 4× 0.11%
Source: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)
Why we flagged this: strategy=index_enhanced + high_r_squared+near_market_beta+fee_premium
Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More
What's next?
You've reviewed RSPG. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.
Data updated on 2026-06-19