Skip to content

RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

Grow my money18y track recordRanked #311 of 2,998 in this goal

Tracks the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index.

By Invesco · Launched 2008

Annual Cost

0.39%

#1,918 of 5,861 · low cost

Fund Size

$9.2B

#299 of 5,861 · large

Return (1Y)Goal

+27.9%

Track Record

18 years

#566 of 5,861 · established

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$13,072+30.7%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

What's inside

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Equity

Cap

Large

Strategy

Index enhanced

Index tracked

S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 23.4% of fundwell diversified

Walmart Inc.
4.1%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.2%
McKesson Corp.
2.4%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.1%
CVS Health Corp.
2.1%
Apple Inc.
2.0%
UnitedHealth Group Inc.
2.0%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
2.0%
Cencora, Inc.
1.8%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.6%

Asset allocation

Stocks
100.0%

By sector

Healthcare
19.3%
Financial Services
15.4%
Technology
13.8%
Consumer Cyclical
12.4%
Consumer Defensive
10.7%
Industrials
9.5%
Communication
7.5%
Energy
5.9%
Other
5.5%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
10.0%Moderate

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-36.0%Severe

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
1.16Strong risk-adjusted returns
Sortino (3Y)
1.70Good downside protection

Listing

Exchange
NYSE Arca

Full fund details

Objective
Tracks the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index.
Strategy
Invests at least 90% of total assets in securities that comprise the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index using full replication methodology. Targets large-cap U.S. companies, maintaining diversification as defined by the Investment Company Act.
Inception date
February 19, 2008
Fund family
Invesco

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Closet indexing
Warning

You're paying active fees for an index

This fund charges active-management prices while tracking its benchmark almost perfectly (a high R²). The metrics below show how little active management you're getting for that premium: low tracking error and a fee well above the passive peer median.

91.4%
TE
3.7%
Beta
0.94
Fee
4× 0.10%

Sources: Cremers & Petajisto (2009) · Amihud & Goyenko (2013) · ESMA (2016)

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've looked at RWL. Save it to your watchlist to weigh it against other funds, then turn your shortlist into a portfolio.

Data updated on 2026-08-04