Skip to content

SPBUAllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF

Take a bet1y track recordRanked #270 of 775 in this goal

Seeks to provide capital appreciation with downside risk mitigation.

By AllianzIM · Launched 2025

Annual Cost

0.79%

#4,047 of 5,562 · expensive

Fund Size

$160M

#2,494 of 5,562 · mid-size

Return (1Y)Goal

+17.9%

Track Record

1 year

#4,223 of 5,562 · young

Performance

Total-return NAV · USD
Growth of $10,000
$11,850+18.5%

Total-return NAV, USD. Net of fund fees, before tax.

Classification

How Beacon categorizes this fund

Asset class

Alternative

Strategy

Structured outcome

What it actually holds

By weight

Concentration

Top 10 holdings = 83.4% of fundconcentrated

ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP APR
8.4%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP NOV
8.4%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP MAY
8.4%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP JUN
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP AUG
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP FEB
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP SEP
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP JUL
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP MAR
8.3%
ALLIANZIM US BF15 UNCAP OCT
8.3%

Asset allocation

Stocks
99.5%
Cash
0.6%

Risk profile

Last 12 months · Sharpe & Sortino need 3+ years
Volatility (1Y)
9.9%Low

Year-on-year price swings

Max drawdown
-8.3%Mild

Worst peak-to-trough loss

Sharpe (3Y)
Unavailable

Needs 3+ years of history

Sortino (3Y)
Not yet

Needs 3+ years of history

Where to buy

Listing

Exchange
Cboe BZX

Full fund details

Objective
Seeks to provide capital appreciation with downside risk mitigation.
Strategy
Actively managed ETF investing in a laddered portfolio of twelve AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETFs. This approach diversifies exposure to Underlying ETFs that track the SPY ETF, providing upside growth potential while mitigating downside risk.
Inception date
March 5, 2025
Fund family
AllianzIM

Our take

Structural notes on how this fund behaves. Read our guide on the 6 warning signs.

Buffer
Warning

Buffer ETF — downside protection at a cost

Defined-outcome funds cap upside (typically 8–20%) in exchange for partial downside protection (9–30%), priced via options. Fees are materially higher than the underlying index (often 0.70%+ vs 0.03–0.10%). For most pre-retirees, a simple stock/bond mix achieves similar downside behaviour at a fraction of the cost.

Source: Morningstar, 'Defined-Outcome ETFs: Useful or Uneconomic?' (2023)

Why we flagged this: strategy=structured_outcome + structured_outcome_strategy

Educational analysis of structural product characteristics. Not investment advice. Always read the fund prospectus and consult a qualified advisor before investing. More

What's next?

You've reviewed SPBU. Save it to your watchlist to track it alongside the other funds you're weighing.

Data updated on 2026-06-19