Screener
AAAU vs ISBG
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF
Key differences
AAAU is a commodity ETF, while ISBG is an alternative ETF. AAAU charges 0.18% a year and ISBG 1.14%.
- AAAU is a commodity fund, while ISBG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AAAU costs 0.96% less per year.
- AAAU is much larger than ISBG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAAU | ISBG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 1.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $5M |
| Since | 2018 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.58% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.63% | -49.42% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.