Screener
AAAU vs BTGD
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
Key differences
AAAU is a commodity ETF, while BTGD is an alternative ETF. AAAU charges 0.18% a year and BTGD 1.05%.
- AAAU is a commodity fund, while BTGD is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AAAU costs 0.87% less per year.
- AAAU is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAAU | BTGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $55M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | -37.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.58% | 55.77% |
| Max drawdown | -21.63% | -53.31% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.