Screener
AAPR vs PGF
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2026 vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGF costs 0.24% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than AAPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAPR is classified as alternative, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AAPR follows a structured outcome strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAPR | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $719M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.45% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -5.99% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAPR and PGF
Explore further