Screener
AAUS vs IVAL
Alpha Architect US Equity ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
Key differences
- AAUS costs 0.23% less per year.
- AAUS follows a active selection strategy; IVAL uses index tracking.
- IVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAUS | IVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $508M | $207M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -9.13% | -46.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAUS and IVAL
Explore further