Screener
IVAL vs QVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
Key differences
- QVAL costs 0.10% less per year.
- IVAL follows a index tracking strategy; QVAL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVAL | QVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $545M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 14.60% |
| Max drawdown | -46.09% | -51.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVAL and QVAL
Explore further