Screener
AAVM vs EBIT
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF
Key differences
Both AAVM and EBIT are equity ETFs. AAVM charges 0.38% a year and EBIT 0.29%. The main difference: AAVM follows a active selection strategy; EBIT uses index tracking.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; EBIT uses index tracking.
- AAVM covers global markets; EBIT covers North America.
- EBIT costs 0.09% less per year.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | EBIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $11M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.96% | 17.20% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -26.64% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.