Screener
AAXJ vs BBJP
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and BBJP are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and BBJP 0.19%. The main difference: BBJP costs 0.53% less per year.
- BBJP costs 0.53% less per year.
- BBJP is much larger than AAXJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $17.4B |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 4.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 19.71% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -32.66% |
Similar to AAXJ and BBJP
Explore further