Screener
AAXJ vs EWJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.23% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than AAXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $21.0B |
| Since | 2008 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 4.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 19.77% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -33.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and EWJ
Explore further