Screener
AAXJ vs CGGO
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and CGGO are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CGGO covers global markets.
- CGGO costs 0.25% less per year.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $11.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 17.47% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.