Screener
AAXJ vs CGGR
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and CGGR are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and CGGR 0.39%. The main difference: AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CGGR covers global markets.
- CGGR costs 0.33% less per year.
- CGGR is much larger than AAXJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $24.4B |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 16.76% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -28.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.