Screener
AAXJ vs EFA
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and EFA are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and EFA 0.32%. The main difference: AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
- EFA costs 0.40% less per year.
- EFA is much larger than AAXJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $77.4B |
| Since | 2008 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 3.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -34.19% |
Similar to AAXJ and EFA
Explore further