Screener
AAXJ vs SCJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.22% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than SCJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $235M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 16.10% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and SCJ
Explore further