Screener
ABFL vs BUFM
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Key differences
- ABFL costs 0.20% less per year.
- ABFL is classified as equity, while BUFM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ABFL follows a active selection strategy; BUFM uses structured outcome.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABFL | BUFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $498M | $397M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.34% | 5.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.95% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABFL and BUFM
Explore further