Screener
ABFL vs FSMD
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
Key differences
Both ABFL and FSMD are equity ETFs. ABFL charges 0.49% a year and FSMD 0.15%. The main difference: ABFL follows a active selection strategy; FSMD uses index tracking.
- ABFL follows a active selection strategy; FSMD uses index tracking.
- FSMD costs 0.34% less per year.
- FSMD is much larger than ABFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ABFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABFL | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $520M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.02% | 15.69% |
| Max drawdown | -34.95% | -40.67% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.