Screener
ABLS vs AFMC
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
Both ABLS and AFMC are equity ETFs. ABLS charges 0.39% a year and AFMC 0.68%. The main difference: ABLS follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- ABLS follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- ABLS costs 0.29% less per year.
- AFMC is much larger than ABLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABLS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $162M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 11.95% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.74% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -19.29% | -42.14% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.