Screener
ABLS vs AIMS
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
Key differences
- ABLS costs 0.36% less per year.
- AIMS is significantly larger than ABLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABLS follows a index tracking strategy; AIMS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABLS | AIMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $82M |
| Since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 12.26% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.44% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.29% | -8.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABLS and AIMS
Explore further