Screener
ABLS vs BUFM
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Key differences
- ABLS costs 0.30% less per year.
- BUFM is significantly larger than ABLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABLS is classified as equity, while BUFM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ABLS follows a index tracking strategy; BUFM uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABLS | BUFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $397M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 12.26% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.4% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.44% | 5.84% |
| Max drawdown | -19.29% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABLS and BUFM
Explore further