Screener
ACES vs ATFV
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Alger 35 ETF
Key differences
- ACES follows a index tracking strategy; ATFV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ATFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACES | ATFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $127M | $141M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.8% | +50.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.1% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.30% | 22.64% |
| Max drawdown | -79.05% | -45.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACES and ATFV
Explore further