Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ACES vs CTEX

ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

ACES

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

ALPS

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$127M

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$6M

Key differences

  • ACES is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, CTEX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ACESCTEX
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.58%
Fund size (AUM)$127M$6M
Since20182021
Dividend yield0.64%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+69.1%+156.4%
CAGR 3Y+0.1%+18.2%
CAGR 5Y-8.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.070.53
Volatility 1Y32.22%41.38%
Max drawdown-79.05%-70.30%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ACES and CTEX