Screener
CTEX vs CCNR
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.19% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CTEX covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
- CTEX follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CTEX | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $394M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +156.4% | +70.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.38% | 17.71% |
| Max drawdown | -70.30% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CTEX and CCNR
Explore further