Screener
ACES vs SMOG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- ACES costs 0.09% less per year.
- ACES covers north america markets; SMOG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACES | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $127M | $152M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.8% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.1% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.30% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -79.05% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACES and SMOG
Explore further