Screener
ACSG vs ILCG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.45% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; ILCG uses index tracking.
- ILCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.38% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and ILCG
Explore further