Screener
ACSG vs ISCG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.43% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $947M |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.16% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -41.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and ISCG
Explore further