Screener
ACSG vs NUMG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- NUMG costs 0.18% less per year.
- NUMG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; NUMG uses index tracking.
- NUMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | NUMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $354M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -38.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and NUMG
Explore further