Screener
ACSG vs SLYG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SLYG costs 0.34% less per year.
- SLYG is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; SLYG uses index tracking.
- SLYG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | SLYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -41.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and SLYG
Explore further